The video above covers a Tennessee bill that would let people use deadly force to defend property, not just life. As of this writing the bill hasn’t become law, and legislation like this gets amended, stalled, or killed all the time, so check the current status of Tennessee law before you act on anything you read here. I’m not a lawyer either; I’m Lance Rankin, a gunsmith and FFL dealer in Roanoke, Texas, and I watch this stuff because my customers ask me about it every week.
It’s worth watching, because this debate is coming to more states than Tennessee.
The case for the bill
The logic from supporters is blunt: don’t steal, and none of this applies to you. Property isn’t just stuff. A stolen work truck or a cleaned-out small business can wreck a family’s livelihood, and the current law expects the owner to hesitate and second-guess while the criminal acts without any hesitation at all. One representative’s line about owners being “expected to wait, expected to hesitate, expected to second guess” got quoted a lot during the debate, and I understand why it landed.
Supporters also argued that jail time has stopped deterring theft in a lot of places, and brazen daylight crime reflects that. Raising the stakes, in their view, is the only deterrent left. The bill isn’t a blank check: it requires a reasonable belief that deadly force is immediately necessary with no other option, it explicitly doesn’t cover shooting someone who’s running away or has their back turned, and a jury can review the whole thing afterward.
The case against it
The concerns are real too, and I won’t wave them off. What happens when someone misreads a situation? During the debate, a representative raised the example of a person with dementia wandering onto the wrong property. Add the wrong-driveway and wrong-door incidents we’ve all seen in the news, and you can see how a law like this could end in a tragedy that no jury instruction fixes.
There’s also the older moral question: theft alone isn’t always a threat to a life. If a thief is grabbing and running, is lethal force the right answer? The bill leaves more room for interpretation there than I’d like, and gray areas in deadly force law get resolved in courtrooms, at the defendant’s expense.
Where I land
Here in Texas we already have some of the broadest property-defense law in the country, and my take after years behind this counter is the same either way: what the law allows and what’s wise are two different questions. A statute might keep you out of prison. It won’t un-fire the shot, and it won’t spare you the civil suit, the legal bills, or living with a mistake.
So I’m sympathetic to the bill’s premise. The burden should sit on the person who chose to commit the crime, not the person who worked for what’s being stolen. But if you carry or keep a gun for defense, your plan should be built around protecting people, with property a distant second. Know your own state’s law cold, and know what comes after the trigger; my post on what to do and not do after a self-defense shooting covers that. Better yet, invest in the prevention side so the question never comes up. My guide to surviving and preventing a home invasion is where I’d start.
Watch how this one plays out in Tennessee. Whatever passes there will show up in another statehouse soon enough.
Lance Rankin is the owner and Chief Gunsmith of Western Sport, a family-run Type 07 FFL and Class 3/SOT dealer in Roanoke, Texas, serving shooters since 2007. Born and raised in Texas with over 50 years of experience handling firearms, Lance purchased Western Sport in 2017 and turned his lifelong passion into his profession. He specializes in AR-15 and AR-10 platform rifles, manufactures Western Sport’s own AR-15 line under the Rankin Industries brand, and runs the shop’s in-house Cerakote coating operation. When he’s not behind the counter or the workbench, you’ll find him on his ranch deep into the night, hunting coyotes with an AR-15 and thermal optics. Lance holds an MBA and personally shoots and tests the products Western Sport sells.